Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's motion for a new trial and vacating his sentence, and whether the court violated the Double Jeopardy Clause and Due Process Clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , )) Pag t pln che Cout te aalorniira 4 Aolh « Asching en fis mals © sober Gplictic ped on 02-04-2004 , Mo. %14-HI. 2 xke . USNC.5.07x ; was denaly , and dabisficd ihe . Fine bopitehins for « APIS AAA? Apert A 3) Meg che Count cblerms he dsl bowst filed do adviAr chefendot of His nyt A pomoinn reilont a obs Aerdinecng Fachinng for We bihnel OL ender, and hots fors jemedty is tk Vacate Sentence g ; 1) Mug he Croat delbinine ex~ pout Jrcts phism of FARSI SIIN (eS as cited 2 til Cowits Rethors pO fobpensd " the cn Veobtion of whe US, 3\ Mg che Cah be plated 2 olubiivina cht « Yiolotion of the Vputd Mths Br bibbion Jer. orcured in he infprich Corts ° Dasa LARS ISP FS violele. Double Teapordy cluses £ I A I