No. 18-5156
D'Angelo Battis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process eleventh-circuit ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review plea-bargaining plea-voluntariness pro-se pro-se-brief pro-se-representation sentencing standard-of-review unconstitutional-sentence
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in ignoring the petitioner's pro se brief on appeal, affirming the petitioner's unconstitutional sentence summarily, and failing to consider whether the petitioner's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it ignored Petitioner's pro se brief in its entirety. 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it affirmed summarily Petitioner's unconstitutional sentence. 3. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in failing to consider whether Petitioner's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. -1
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent