Whether the state court's application of the Jackson standard of review in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence violated clearly established federal law as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The plain error of the State of Texas Appeals Courts on direct collateral review. The use of Jackson standard of view in the light most favorable to the , prosecution an unreasonable application of clearly established law as determined : by the U.S. Supreme Court. In voilation of Texas Const. Art. V § 5/6 and U.S. Const 5,6,14 of Burden of proof of necessary elements of offense. The Plain meaning rule applied to the AEDP Act of 1996 fundamental unfair to non capital cases where counsel is not appointed to file timely, and have access to information more readly than incarcerated pro se offender with not any formal legal law training. The plain language of the statute mean death penalty cases.