No. 18-5170
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-determination citizenship-and-naturalization-fraud citizenship-status due-process evidence evidence-standard fraud immigration immigration-law jurisdiction legal-review marriage naturalization naturalization-fraud standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was evidence presented at trial that petitioner was lawfully married to Shabana before he became naturalized?
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : fettoner: Me. Tez Khon Case: nl whether Shere was evidence _presentecl at teal that peti toner Mes latully sinned te Shabsan befoxe. te became Mattrsaleed ? 2. Whether AN autho r/2.ed Agency's finding andl chlermuation can be Changed! tditheal top, das etislen ce? I i nee t: Whether Pettionee Me. Linz Khan comm teal bra a rhiy, f20ly _ On fraud sal bes Liesl thernege Te Wilks. Yen Hua then oe ac ee
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent