Whether the lower court erred in allowing the appellee's 'because I said so' defense without sworn testimony

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . 1. Whether this court continue to let the appellee, Frank S. Buck hereinafter _ Buck, (or the defense) continue the “Because I said so” defense even with " expert (Curt Baggett) testimony, and without Buck’s sworn testimony? 2. Whether any person that represents the court in any capacity above the law? 3. Whether the kangaroo (district) court’s procedural and evidentiary rulings constituted an abuse of discretion requiring reversal of the judgment? 4. Whether the petitioner, Baltimore’s “new evidence” and confirmation (by Curt Baggett) of Baltimore’s forged signature require reversal of the Judgment or set aside the judgement in Kimberly Baltimore v. Jon Byron Nelson et al (hereinafter case 2013-900993)? 5. Whether Buck is getting rich on the back of his clients and have all of Jefferson County, AL attorneys and judges and others on his payroll? 6. Whether the kangaroo (district court) in this case, and kangaroo (district court ) judge and the attorneys for the defense in case 2013-900993 conspire with Buck to cover up the fraud in this case and have both cases dismissed? 7. Whether Baltimore’s original complaint includes basic facts underlying ; actions that are relatively uncontroverted? 8. Whether, Buck is under violation of 2015 Ala. code fraud 8, Section 6-5-104 Deceit Fraudulent deceit. 9. Whether the district court erred and in violation of 28 U.S. Code § 1746 when Buck did not offer any sworn testimony in this case? 10. Whether Baltimore will ever receive a fair case of any kind in Jefferson County, Alabama? ! _[ 4 . 7