No. 18-5184
Ahmad Sayed Hashimi v. United States
IFP
Tags: appeal criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process harmless-error ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel right-to-maintain-innocence sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent trial-strategy
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the case of United States v. Anmad Hashimi should be remanded for review and decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in light of the United States Supreme Court's case of McCoy v. Louisiana
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the case of United States v. Anmad Hashimi, (No. 16-4846 — Fourth Cir.) should be remanded for review and decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in light of the United States Supreme Court’s case of McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018), decided/issued on May 14, 2018.
Docket Entries
2018-11-16
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2018-10-15
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U. S. ___ (2018).
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-10
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2018-08-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 10, 2018.
2018-08-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2018 to September 10, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2018)
Attorneys
Ahmad Hashimi
Ahmad S. Hashimi — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent