No. 18-5186
Dominick Theresa v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure claim-limitations claim-validity due-process judicial-review legal-principles patent patent-claims patent-examination pro-se pro-se-litigation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent
DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts deprived the pro se petitioner of due process and disregarded the limitations within the patent claims as well as the validity of each claim, which involves important legal principles and due process for pro se patent applicants
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED a The jower courts deprived the Pro Se, Petitioner of Due Process and the disregard to address the limitations within the patent Claims as well as the validity of each Claim. These deprived matters upon the Pro Se, Petitioner involves an unusually important of legal : principles as well as Due Process is an importance to the general public when filing patents Pro Se. , I
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent Andrei Iancu to respond filed.
2018-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2018)
Attorneys
Andrei Iancu
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent