No. 18-5188
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) abuse-of-discretion district-court judicial-discretion plain-error plainly-unreasonable revocation revocation-sentence sentencing sentencing-factors supervised-release unreasonable-sentence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court imposed a plainly unreasonable revocation sentence by failing to properly balance the sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED IL Did the District Court enter a plainly unreasonable sentence for revocation of supervised release when it did not properly balance the sentencing factors? i
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2018)
Attorneys
James Wilks
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent