Whether filing a Title VII action to which the underlying EEOC charge failed to assert retaliation, an amended complaint allegation asserting retaliation as the motive for an employment termination was an alternative to the original complaint allegation that the termination/constructive discharge was a result of a discriminatory motive affects federal-court subject matter jurisdiction in the action or, instead, delineates a substantive ingredient of a Title VII claim for relief to be resolved on the merits in this case

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether any of the district court’s procedural and evidentiary rulings constituted an abuse of discretion requiring reversal of a judgement. 2. Whether filing Title VII action to which the underlying EEOC charge failed to assert retaliation, an amended complaint allegation asserting retaliation as the motive for an employment termination was an alternative to the original complaint allegation that the Termination/ Constructive Discharge was a result of a discriminatory motive affects federal-court subject matter jurisdiction in the action or, instead, delineates a substantive ingredient of a Title VII claim for relief to be : resolve on the merits on this case. i