No. 18-5198

Ronald David Jones v. Grand Canyon University, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure default-judgment due-process federal-courts obstruction-of-justice private-university service-of-process service-of-summons standing venue-change
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in dismissing the case despite defendants' failure to properly serve a response within the required timeframe

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Why did the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division not rule on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment when they knew that the Defendants refused service of summons. 2. Why did the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division not on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment when they knew that Defendants did not respond within 21 days after service of summon on Plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure? 3. Does service of summon mean that only Plaintiff had to service by putting it in the Defendants hands? 4. Don’t the Defendants have to service Plaintiff a response within 21 days by putting it in Plaintiff's hand not by putting it in the mail after the 21 days? 5. Why were the Defendants waiting to the last minute to respond when they knew that time is everything in these type of cases? 6. Why did the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division allow Defendants to do anything they want any way they wanted to? 7. Did someone from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division call the Defendants on the last day at the last minute and tell them that they needed to respond to Plaintiff's Summons in this Civil Action? 8. Don’t Service of summon mean putting it in Plaintiff's hand to prevent the very thing in which the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division did when they conspired with Defendants denying Plaintiff his rights? 9, Was someone paid off? 10.Why Defendant James Newman never served? 11. Why per Mr. Meyer, per Dan Steimel, Assistant General Counsel would not confirm or deny any Grand Canyon University relationship with named individual defendants and not authorized to accept on behalf of named individual defendants? 12.Why in the end Defendants were defended by the attorney for Grand Canyon? 3 13. Why did the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division do a change of venue when Plaintiff strongly objected because Christ Town Ministries place of Internship is in Quincy. 14. Why did the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division let Defendants attorney do anything he wanted? 15.Was someone paid off? GCU and Christ Town Ministries is the same case. 16.Why did the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division do everything in its power to dismiss Plaintiff's case and complicate matters? 17. Why did the United States District Court For the District of Arizona, Phoenix do all of the above for Defendants in this case? 18.Why did the United States District Court For the District of Arizona, Phoenix in the middle of helping with the Service of Summon Dismiss Plaintiff's case? 19.Was someone paid off? 20. Why did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit do all of the above for Defendants in this case? 21.Why did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit so rude to Plaintiff and no one would even rehear Plaintiff? 22. Was someone paid off? 23.Is not this obstruction of justice by the United States District Court For the Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division, the United States District Court For the District of Arizona, Phoenix and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit? 24.They all seem to have an agenda... Was someone paid off? 25.1s not Trump University a private university? 26.Don’t the same rules apply to Grand Canyon University that applies to Trump University you cannot sue or serve summon on a private university? 27.Why not everyone just refuse service of summon? 28. Will refusing service of summon make everything go away? 29.Why are these court allowed to do anything they want any way they want without any course of action? 30.Is not Justice d

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-25
Waiver of right of respondents Grand Canyon University, et al. to respond filed.
2018-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Grand Canyon University, et al.
Michael A. SchernSchern Richardson Finter Decker, PLC, Respondent
Michael A. SchernSchern Richardson Finter Decker, PLC, Respondent
Ronald Jones
Ronald David Jones — Petitioner
Ronald David Jones — Petitioner