Should Kruskal be entitled to a full release for paying off the entire judgment lien on 10/1/2015

No question identified. : V It) QUESTIONS AShould Kruskal be entitled to a full release for paying off the entire judgment lien on 10/1/2015 BOn 10/1/2015, when Kruskal entirely paid off the judgment lien, does that nullify all subsequent punitive collection awards. CShould Kruskal (again) be entitled to a full release for paying off the judgment lien . on 4/26/2017 at the Albuquerque land sale. DDid DeStefano skim $24,221.78 from checks paid into the trust account, before sending the payments to the Meltzers. EDoes the court have to announce which of the 3 entirely different explanations it relies on to find that $24,221.78 was Not stolen from the Meltzer trust account. FIs Kruskal entitled to know which “fabricated” explanation the court is relying on such that Kruskal can have a proper opportunity to respond, and such that Kruskal can know what he is appealing? GIs the district court allowed to award any collection fees for collections on “other properties” that were not secured by the original contract? ~ HDoes district court have to site some authority in order to award collection fees? |After Kruskal filed the 5/5/2017 Emergency Motion, should district court have given . Kruskal a lien release, or at least required DeStefano to provide a payoff amount. ‘ JWhen the Metizer’s interfered with sales contracts by refusing to provide a lien release, and refusing to provide Kruskal with a payoff amount, was this tantamount to Kruskal yet again paying off the lien in full, and deserving of a release? KDid DeStefano overcharge attorney fees? LIs Kruskal entitied to a triple refund for improperly charged attorney fees? MShould the district court have Included the double billing to Ski Valley properties when it calculated how much Kruskal had paid the Meltzers for collection fees. NDo action speak louder than words when the Meltzers took all they wanted from the $175,000 that was tendered in Oct. 2015. ; Ots Kruskal entitled to punitive damages, sanctions, or his attorney fees for defending this absurdly frivolous motion. ;