No. 18-5209
Michael Barrett v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal appellate-procedure attorney-client-relationship conflict-of-interest constructive-denial-of-counsel impermissible-risk ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion professional-ethics professional-responsibility right-to-counsel standard-of-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does it create a conflict of interest for a lawyer to have to argue on appeal that the trial court should have replaced him? Can this create an impermissible risk of constructive denial of counsel, as it puts the attorney and client's interests at odds?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does it create a conflict of interest for a lawyer to have to argue on appeal . that the trial court should have replaced him? Can this create an impermissible risk of constructive denial of counsel, as it puts the attorney and client's interests at odds? 2. If a judge undermines the attorney-client relationship, should new counsel be appointed to avoid the appearance of impropriety? . -i. . .
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-04
Reply of petitioner Michael Barrett filed. (Distributed)
2018-11-20
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-10-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 21, 2018.
2018-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2018 to November 21, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2018.
2018-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 21, 2018 to October 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-22
Response Requested. (Due September 21, 2018)
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent