No. 18-5219
Anthony Tyrone Campbell v. J. Mendez, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-procedure administrative-remedies circuit-court-of-appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process excessive-force exhaustion-of-remedies judicial-review litigation-reform prison-litigation-reform-act section-1983 standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision conflicted with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision on the issue of whether the plaintiff substantially exhausted administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did a™ Circuit Court of APPeals decision conflict with iO™ Circurt Court of Appeals decision where determining factor significanty Substamtiate Plaintiff did not failto timely exhaust administrative remedies? 2. Did Plaintiff, Pursuant to $1997 €cad,of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, factually exhaust administrative remedies as far as available Priar to bringing forth his § 1483 Civil — achon claim? |
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent J. Mendez, et al. to respond filed.
2018-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2018)
Attorneys
J. Mendez, et al.