Whether the Ninth Circuit's opinion unreasonably insulates the state court decision from review and conflicts with Ohio v. Reiner

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, which determined that it could not review a state court decision that interpreted federal law because the state court decision also involved analysis of a state statute, unreasonably insulates the state court decision from review and conflicts with Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (2001)? 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit’s opinion that interpreted state law contrary to the meaning ascribed to the statute by the state appellate court conflicts with Bradshaw v. Richey, 546 U.S. 74, 76 (2005), Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62 (1991), and Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975)? i