No. 18-5241

Victor Maturino v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law commentary-amendments destructive-devices double-jeopardy due-process firearms firearms-possession guideline-commentary offense-level-increases rulemaking-authority sentence-enhancement sentencing-commission-process sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sentencing Commission may amend the commentary to the Sentencing Guidelines to create new categories of conduct that increase sentences without following the established process for drafting and approving sentencing guidelines

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Sentencing Guidelines in § 2K2.1 setting forth provisions concerning unlawful possession of firearms and specific offense characteristics provide for increases in the offense level where the offense involves three or more "firearms". Precedent in a number of circuits holds that "inert" grenades containing no explosives are not "destructive devices" and therefore do not qualify as "firearms" which can increase the offense level. The questions are: 1. May the commentary to the guidelines be amended to describe a new category of conduct, distinct from possession, by which firearms "sought to be obtained" may be counted for sentence enhancement purposes where the underlying guideline has not been so amended and makes no provision for "attempted" possession. 2. May the Sentencing Commission amend guideline commentary to create new offenses carrying higher sentences without following the established process for drafting and approval of sentencing guidelines by the U.S. Sentencing Commission and Congress?

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2018)

Attorneys

United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Victor Maturino
Randall Harrison NunnRandall H. Nunn, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Randall Harrison NunnRandall H. Nunn, Attorney at Law, Petitioner