Whether the Supreme Court should address the application and contours of the residual clause of the Career Offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, in light of Johnson v. United States, Beckles v. United States, and Sessions v. Dimaya

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court should address the application and contours of the residual clause of the Career Offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, in light of Johnson v. United States, 576U.S.___, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), Beckles v. United States, __ U.S. __, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017), and Sessions v. Dimaya, __U.S.__,_ S.Ct. (2018).