James McCray v. S. L. Burt, Warden
HabeasCorpus
Whether the Sixth Circuit decision is objectively unreasonable as a matter of due process, because McCray's sentencing guidelines offense variable(s) was unconstitutionally scored a total of 40 points, where any fact found by judge that increases the minimum sentence guidelines, not by jury beyond a reasonable doubt, or admitted by the defendant violates the 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L VMETHER THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DECISION IS _— OBJECTIVELY so TINREASONABL'E AS 8 MATTER OF DUE PROCESS, BECAUSE MCCRAY SENTENCING GUIDEVTNES OFFENSE © VARIABLETS] WAS UNCONSTITUTIONALL'Y SCORED & TOTAL OF 40 POINTS, WHERE ANY FACT FOUND BY JUDGE THAT INCREASE THE MINIMUM SENTENCE GUIDELINES, NOT BY JURY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, OR ADMITTED RY THE DEFENDANT VIOLATES THE 6TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?