Whether the Oregon courts failed to properly apply precedent case law regarding the proper mechanism for judicial review of a lower court's decision opposing a higher court's case law decision

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Sct Bn nportant \esue oF Law and Back Yor Ye Porpase of Review lay ng court Uhen ne State df Oregons Manest Court Faled Vo UPS WS OLoH PLOT precident Case Law decision, Con Cerning the proper mechamsm For Dudicval Ceview oF & lower Courts opposing Anat higher Courts CaSe Law decision? 2) 18 TA feviewable tack f Law, inthe interest of the Publi ty Wat nere openly exist 3 Conspiracy inthe State Courts; te openly deny Petitioner as & Proner~ ACCESS tq ries Peacess of Lau. Equal Treatment Wrere dre te we + ISSues is Rourk oF. der Aremriesing Peditionet’s E ¥ mek Fending t without ment, without PRViewi nq Tne ies without Wolding \n totem of Hearing? na . W Xnouk oriner et ee For Nhe OT Egon Coury ot Appeals Yo attiom , 1 Nonenkorceatle court order which tt had Previously ave the trial |. . ’ \v We WIE ¢ 4 mae CBVe To TA, to onake, & & Dudqmrentr? Yo reverse te ts ‘Omen Yre oreqon Supteme tourt to Fail ‘ks order thot Se OF appeals~ wihere Ye court of appeals ted \n & ew e Tia rout Order/ jag etroneaus~ ut Att! — Nwitrout ogitiog? Yo / LORS Stronecus Wut REF Cmed, , A , -#e ; ay