whether-a-drastically-increased-sentence-violates-the-sixth-amendment

QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER A DRASTICALLY INCREASED. SENTENCE (FROM ROUGHLY / . 10 YEARS TO 12 YEARS) THAT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REASONABLE BUT FOR JUDGE-FOUND FACTS VIOLATES THE SIXTH AMENDMENT. WHETHER REHEARING EN BANC WAS JUSTIFIED WHENEVER "THE PANEL DECISION CONFLICTED WITH A DECISION OF THE UNITED — STATES SUPREME COURT, "FED.R.APP.P. 35(B)(1)(A), AND . RESOLUTION OF THE CONFLICT THROUGH "EN BANC" CONSIDERATION . WAS NECESSARY TO SECURE OR MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY OF THE COURT'S DECISIONS." Id 35(a)(1). , i