No. 18-5262
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure due-process equal-protection fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court independent-action judicial-delay judicial-procedure mandamus third-circuit writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a writ of mandamus is the proper remedy to compel the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to rule on petitioner's independent action alleging 'fraud on the court' that has been pending for two years
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED “4. , WHETHER A WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS THE PROPER REMEDY TO COMPEL THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO RULE ON HIS INDEPENDENT ACTION “PRAUD ON THE COURT*’THAT HAS BEEN : : PENDING FOR TWO YEARS ON THE DOCKET?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2018-05-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)
Attorneys
UNITED STATES
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent