Whether a court may grant a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition collaterally challenging a sentence under Johnson when the sentencing judge never specified - and therefore the record is silent on - whether the petitioner's original sentence was enhanced pursuant to the ACCA's now-invalidated residual clause

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) | Whether a court may grant a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition collaterally challenging a sentence under Johnson when the sentencing judge never specified — and therefore the record is silent on — whether the petitioner’s original sentence was enhanced pursuant to the ACCA’s now-invalidated residual clause. 2.) | Whether a conviction for robbery qualifies as a “violent felony” under the ACCA’s elements clause where, as in Florida and several other states, the offense may be committed by using a de minimis amount of force. i PARTIES INVOLVED The parties identified in the caption of this case are the only parties before the Court. ii