No. 18-5279
Jonathan Hayhoe v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception law-enforcement-conduct magistrate-powers qualified-immunity search-and-seizure suppression suppression-of-evidence void-ab-initio warrant-validity
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether conduct by law enforcement in securing a void in initio warrant was grossly negligent, thereby precluding application of good-faith exception
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether conduct by law enforcement in securing a void in initio warrant . in violation of the Fourth Amendment was grossly negligent, thereby precluding application of good-faith exception established by this Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984). ; | | | -i;
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)
2018-05-30
Application (17A1312) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 20, 2018.
2018-05-23
Application (17A1312) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 17, 2018 to July 20, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Jonathan Hayhoe
Emily Deck Harrill — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Emily Deck Harrill — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent