Whether Mr. Autobee's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the constitutionality of the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was timely

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Mr. Autobee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the constitutionality of the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was timely because it was filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015); 2. Whether the offense of armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 21138(a), (d), qualifies as a crime of violence under the felony force clause. 1 The term “felony force clause” refers to the force clause as used to define a “crime of violence,” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and a “violent felony,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). This case impacts the interpretation of both clauses. See United States v. Wray, 776 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (10th Cir. 2015). 1