No. 18-5295

Miguel Pedraza v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdiction mental-competency procedural-default standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in denying petitioner's certificate of appealability application based on the conclusion that he failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ISSUE ONE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER’S CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (COA) APPLICATION BASED ON THE CONCLUSION, THAT PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF A DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2). . i

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)

Attorneys

Miguel Pedraza
Miguel Pedraza — Petitioner