No. 18-5298
Reuben Stewart v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-922g 18-usc-924 18-usc-924e2bii 8th-amendment aggravated-assault criminal-law due-process johnson-precedent johnson-v-united-states means-rea mens-rea recklessness sentencing statutory-interpretation violent-felony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a prior conviction predicated on a mens rea of recklessness qualify as a violent felony under 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 192 L. Ed. 2d 569 (2015)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does a prior conviction predicated on a means rea of : recklessness qualify as a violent felony under 18 U.S.C. : section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 192 L. Ed. 2d 569 (2015)? 2. Does Florida's aggravated assatlt conflict with Supreme Court precedence, while also creating a split in lower courts? :
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-08-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 21, 2018.
2018-08-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 22, 2018 to September 21, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent