Was LR found guilty at trial, when the transcripts of pre-trial clearly show she said nothing happened sexually?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A Whu was LR Fovnd Qes\ty @t trial, When The Yranscripts OF pre AA 4 Cally Shows chor She Saad nothing happened Sexvoiiy? DQ. Grounds For diemasol oF mu Came ;were oravalr Up at mu erik by ne digerice at kernens Ave Ho Wnt adh oF Evidences Tre Sudge denied Vey but Loder Winsett orauaite ve LP AgQQIns Only te deny ie agente We agreed Are Mt AQSinNy why WAS L Sound auiley oF ne evidence? 3.W hy Wass Th Senkenced Ane MoKimum rma, For al\ of Anese Cnorge.dy Wren Atha rranscriptS Srovs thot She Kept Cranaynd, \ner Story Meanina her ATONE EES ATS CanF\\ ohana even A\ 80, mentioning, QAEANgTRe Mo evidence OF MYGEN derna, ann OF Ans,