No. 18-531
Response Waived
Tags: cady-v-dombrowski cady-v-drombrowski community-caretaking constitutional-law exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment immediate-need objective-facts police-assistance probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure warrant-requirement warrantless-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Privacy
FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court's holding in Cady v. Dombrowski permits a warrantless seizure under the Fourth Amendment without objective facts establishing an immediate discernible need for assistance
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THIS COURT’S HOLDING IN CADY V. DROMBROWSEI, 413 U.S. 433 (1973), PERMITS A WARRANTLESS SEIZURE UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WITHOUT OBJECTIVE FACTS ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE DISCERNIBLE NEED FOR ASSISTANCE.
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent Iowa to respond filed.
2018-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)
2018-09-11
Application (18A253) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until October 20, 2018.
2018-09-07
Application (18A253) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 20, 2018 to October 25, 2018, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Iowa
Kevin Cmelik — Iowa Department of Justice, Respondent
Kevin Cmelik — Iowa Department of Justice, Respondent
Terry Lee Coffman
Matthew Thomas Lindholm — Gourley, Rehkemper, and Lindholm, PLC, Petitioner
Matthew Thomas Lindholm — Gourley, Rehkemper, and Lindholm, PLC, Petitioner