No. 18-5310
Walter N. Rhodes, Jr. v. Shane Baker, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation timeliness
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus petition as untimely under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : : t enna | i i fd charg e ftitins inh a ak tele» fd aleaga dust aso deesws) the | Dut Afftal byuavalat Gu theese the douivaluct-, — 4 the "Diet Renbw" of 29 1150. 2244 AM (A\2 | , | | | ; } ' a — i !
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent Fla. Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2018-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2018)
Attorneys
Fla. Department of Corrections
Beverly Bartlett Brewster — Office of General Counsel, Respondent
Beverly Bartlett Brewster — Office of General Counsel, Respondent
Walter N. Rhodes, Jr.
Keith Wayne Upson — The Upson Law Group, P.L., Petitioner
Keith Wayne Upson — The Upson Law Group, P.L., Petitioner
Walter N. Rhodes Jr. — Petitioner
Walter N. Rhodes Jr. — Petitioner