Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit erroneously determined that the statutory definition of a 'violent felony' under the 'elements clause' of the Armed Career Criminal Act does not require the intentional, knowing, or reckless use, attempted use, or threatened use of violent force
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in contrast to every other federal circuit except for the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, erroneously determined that the statutory definition of a “violent felony,” as provided under the “elements clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i), encompasses crimes that do not require as an element the intentional, knowing, or reckless use, attempted use, or threatened use of violent force. i
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-20
Reply of petitioner Joseph Steele filed. (Distributed)(11/23/2018)
2018-11-05
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 5, 2018.
2018-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2018 to November 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2018.
2018-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 21, 2018 to October 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-22
Response Requested. (Due September 21, 2018)
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2018)