Whether Appellant Terry Should Have Been Denied a Certificate of Appealability as Evidence Exists in the Record That His Trial Attorney Was Clearly Ineffective for Failure to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence and Evidence of His Discovery So Appellant Could Have Built a Meritorious Case Before the Jury as Opposed to Being Involuntarily Pled Guilty

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . a | ME Whether Appellant Ferry Should Have . Been Den/sed a Cerf Lie ite ol A la ble ws aA viden ce Exs (sts ; Zn The [eecoed ] That His E'al Athesy | Was Clea-ly Ficekhe tive for Fa,/ere Zo “Dis close EXxXCUI~A toEvidence Quad en, Evidence of Ais Dis covery Se Aypellan 7 . Could Have Build A be ! 88 00 ring Tru | Jury 4s OfPISES IS a LZ “ ID Gul, fone Tawolurtarly Lkered.) ME . Whetber Tre Jower Co weed Gres Te “Den yn peti Piore Sf! Ye! 2 | ° XO) Oy, afave AS Cegel Ferny Tha ALgh* JS Ta AS Con Fey Lions Leard with fee , fy A flomey Fenkrlay Taeklechve As TS" ) Cen fered on L fla Errod] and, Coe / Disco vey po stant to_LFADY } peptone” [hype lan E v/ola7re3 aodfer . y violated Mis Sth Anendneat 4. urder The ys: Cond of Se] Ty io LEC EQUA Ones Lon Q& DUE fU00C-ESS. VI | Cf