No. 18-534
Well Luck Company, Inc. v. United States
Tags: administrative-law customs-classification customs-law explanatory-notes general-rules-of-interpretation hts-heading-1206 hts-heading-2008 legislative-intent nesoi prior-statutory-construction statutory-construction statutory-interpretation tariff-classification trade-classification
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the panel disregarded legislative intent and prior statutory construction to improperly use the General Rules of Interpretation and the Explanatory Notes to justify its classification of the sunflower seeds under HTS Heading 2008, despite its NESOI language.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the panel disregarded legislative intent and prior statutory construction to improperly use the General Rules of Interpretation and the Explanatory Notes to justify its classification of the sunflower seeds under HTS Heading 2008, despite its NESOI language
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-11
Reply of petitioner Well Luck Company, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-25
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 25, 2019.
2018-11-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2018 to January 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 26, 2018.
2018-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2018 to December 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Well Luck Company, Inc.
Robert T. Givens — Givens & Johnston,PLLC, Petitioner