No. 18-5341
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review civil-procedure default-judgment due-process equal-protection jurisdiction service-of-process standing
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appeals court committed a reversible error by denying the petitioner's motion to vacate a default judgment, where the petitioner claims he was never properly served and the judges were required by law to consider the merits
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(s) PRESENTED oe 0. OrO 4VE PpecAls Coutk comme a. c | MSS CORAEALE of GustEre BY pend we my sodet Clotucy Opeeal, wher & a pee @S WELLE MEY Over AWE mene) AnD | + a Ate, Genet) ak AM) vw Wee lk MEANS | pox Re S Pen ne SuOCES WECE AE QUSZED gray Oo OE ye CULE Foh. . , ee “LISTOF PARTIES ay : . i: fan parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. os vs om a a os C] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ‘Alist of ae wee : os “so. "all
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent