No. 18-5356
Joaquin H. Ciria v. California
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence civil-procedure civil-procedure,fraud,rule-60(b),actual-innocence, fraud fraud-upon-court procedural-mechanism rule-60(b) rule-60b successive-petition timeliness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Rule 60(b) is the correct procedure for raising claims of fraud committed upon the court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED. I. , IF A PEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 60(b) MOTION ("Rule 60(b") THE CORRECT PROSEDURE FOR RAISING CLAIMS OF FRAUD COMMITTED UPON THE COURT? , II. DID THE DISTRICT COURT'S DETERMINATION THAT PETITIONER'S RULE 60(b) WAS UNTIMELY AND/OR A SECOND SUCCESSIVE PETITION COMPORT WITH HIS CLAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE DUE TO FRAUD UPON THE COURT?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2017-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2018)