WHETHER PETTTIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS RIGHT TO CONFRONT WITNESSES, HIS RIGHT TO PRESENT A DEFENSE, AND HIS RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AT TRIAL WHERE THE TRIAL COURT DENIED "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" A PRETRIAL MOTION TO INTRODUCE EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT'S BIAS AND PRIOR SEXUAL ACTIVITY UNDER MICHIGAN'S RAPE SHIELD STATUTE, WHERE COUNSEL COUNSEL FAILED TO PROPERLY AND FULLY LITIGATE A REQUEST TO INTRODUCE THAT EVIDENCE, AND WHERE COUNSEL FATLED TO RENEW HIS MOTION TO INTRODUCE SUCH EVIDENCE AT THE CLOSE OF THE PROSECUTION'S CASE PER THE TRIAL COURT'S PRETRIAL ORDER; AND WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ON APPEAL WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO PROPERLY AND FULLY LITIGATE THIS CLAIM ON APPEAL, AND WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO BRING THE TERMS OF TRIAL COURT'S PRETRIAL ORDER TO THE ATTENTION OF THE APPELLATE COURT'S ?

Whether petitioner was deprived of his right to confront witnesses, his right to present a defense, and his right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial