Does a civil commitment court have the constitutional authority to usurp custody and personal jurisdiction over a person prior to the expiration of their criminal sentence?

No question identified. : "© Bxnibit 7 QUESTIONS OF LAW 1. Does a Department of Corrections (DOC) or sentencing court retain constitutional custody and personal jurisdiction over a person until the expiration of his sentence? 2. Can a civil commitment court constitutionally usurp the DOC or sentencing court custody and personal jurisdiction over a per— son prior to his expiration of sentence? 3. Does a civil commitment court have the power or authority to constitutionally usurp a persons custody and personal juris-. diction that is properly in the Doc or sentencing court and prior to the expiration of sentence, and in violation of the person's liberty interests rights, and due process and equal protection of the law rights? 4. Does a state civil commitment court have the constitutional authority and personal jurisdiction of a DOC prisoner or in cus. tody of the sentencing court prior to the prisoner's expiration . of sentence? : 5. Does the civil commitment circuit court have constitutional power and authority and personal jurisdiction to issue judgments, orders or decrees prior to a prisoner's expiration of sentence «and circumventing the custody and personal jurisdiction of the . . boc or the sentencing court? 6. Are the judgments, orders and decrees of a civil commitment circuit court when issued prior to the prisoner's expiration of sentence or are the judgments, orders, and decrees null and void ab initio? Questions of Law 7. Does a civil commitment circuit court have the jurisdiction and constitutional authority to enforce unconstitutional statutory provisions that do not provide personal jurisdiction prior to a personer's expiration of sentence in the custody and personal jurisdiction of the DOC or the sentencing court? . 8. Does the state legislature have the constitutional authority to enact legislation that violates well established state and federal law in personal jurisdiction or is those unconstitutional statutory provisions not providing for personal jurisdiction nuil and void ab initio? : 9. Does a state legislature have the constitutional authority to legislate in violation of well established jurisdictional mandate in violation of liberty interest rights, and due process and . equal protection of the law rights? . 10. Does a facially unconstitutional statutory provision become null and void ab initio, as a statute, if it cannot stand and be enforced wholly and independently of severed unconstitutional .: : provisions? , : : 11. Does a state legislature have the constitutional authority and descretion to enact statute that is constitutionally null and void ab initio due to lack of provision for personal jurisdiction? . 2 of 2 : ° tf eeniwit's Page 1 » IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ; BY ‘ In Re Commitment of Docket Number: ° Thomas M. Juresic, ; oe Plaintiff. . IN PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI . t IN REVIEW OF ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT DENIAL UNDER CAUSE M14080 AND 223872, and [OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS STATE'S PETITION UNDER 725 ILCS 207/1 ET SEG AS NUTI. AND VOTD AR INITIO, AND . UNDER MOTION. FOR EXPEDIATED REORDER see wok MOTION TO DISMISS STATE'S PETITION UNDER 725 ILCS 207/1 ET SEG AS NULL AND VOID AB INITIO, AND CHALLENGE TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTORY PROVISIONS UNDER 725 ILCS 207/1 ET SEG AS NULL AND VOID AB INITIO, AND . UNDER ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT RULES 381 AND 383, AND UNDER UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES 10 (a-c), AND TITLE 28,§ 1257, AND ROOKER-FELDMAN DOCTRINE NOW COMES Thomas M. Juresic, plaintiff herein, and seeking issues statutorily and constitutionally the same, and as a result of the facially unconstitutional statutory provisions under 725 ILCS 207/1 et seg, who deposes and attests as follows: 1. The plaintiff files in the instant cause under the aforesaid Motion to Dismiss and resulting from the same statutory and constitutional issues stemming from unconstitutionally legislated Illinois Statutory provisions, and to preserve the time and resources of the honorableaddressed U