Did the State forfeit the claim, reliance or remedy of Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 1 and U.S. v Charles, 801 F.3d 855 (7th Cir.) of an unconstitutional statute not negating probable cause under the rules of forfeiture as stated in People v. Gaines 105 Ill.2d 79, 85 Ill. Dec.269, 274, 473 N.E.2d 868 cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1131, 105 S.Ct. 2666 and Teague v. Lane, 109 S.Ct 1060, 103 L.Ed 334

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did the State forfeit the claim, reliance or remedy of Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 1 and U.S. v Charles, 801 F.3d 855 (7" Cir.) of an unconstitutional statute not negating probable cause under the rules of forfeiture as stated in People v. Gaines 105 II.2d 79, 85 Ill. Dec.269, 274, 473 N.E.2d 868 cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1131, 105 S.Ct. 2666 and Teague v. Lane, 109 S.Ct 1060, 103 L.Ed 334. 2. Did the Supreme Court of Illinois err remanding my case back tot eh Appellate Court for reconsideration in light of ‘People v. Holmes 2017 IL 120407, and denying my Petition for leave to appeal (