Whether the defendant's substantial rights were affected by the district court's use of 'additional evidence' in imposing a guidelines sentence within an incorrect guidelines range

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DEFENDANT SEEKS THIS SUPREME COURT'S REVIEW OF HIS ABOVE GUIDELINES SENTENCE IMPOSED WITHIN AN INCORRECT GUIDELINES : RANGE UTILIZING "ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE" WHICH SEVERLY AFFECTS PETITIONER'S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF THE RULING IN MOLINA-MARTINEZ V. U.S., 578 U.S. 136 S.CT. 1338, 194 L.ED. 444 (2016); ROSALES-MIRELES V. U.S. 2018 BL 214344 U.S. NO. 16-9493 (JUNE 18, 2018).