No. 18-5381

Aslam Handy v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights discrimination due-process eeoc federal-reserve financial-crisis financial-misconduct free-speech job-discrimination sovereign-immunity whistle-blower
Key Terms:
Patent ClassAction
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why has the Federal Reserve still not been asked to open its books?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Why has the Federal Reserve still not been asked to open its books to find out who exactly they have been giving backdoor help since 2001 that lead to '08 financial mortgage crises and which they have continued doing since ‘08, in spite of movies like "Inside Job", "Big Short", numerous attempts by Congress, media etc. requesting them to open their books and increasing evidence for the need for : the same, as submitted by the defendant, who was the chief architect at the Federal Reserve in '07‘08? 2. Why are EEOC, Whistle Blower and other constitutional laws continuing to be violated since '08 by discriminating against me in job applications at various Federal Reserve Bank locations across USA {over 100+ job applications since '08), as well as at other companies both in USA and abroad over whom Federal Reserve has regulatory oversight and/or are subcontractors to the Federal Reserve? 3. Why have EEOC, US Attorney General and other lawyers for defendants involved in this case requested proof that | was meeting or exceeding job description requirements for which | was hired for at these companies (submitted as evidence); and have done nothing once that proof was provided? 4. Why have the lawyers for the named defendants basically done a cut & paste from previous cases they had worked on to show that my case has no merit (Between the lawyers for the 4 defendants 108 references were cited as reasons for dismissal, with computer search from no two law firms citing : the same cases) and not been disciplined for the same? Since we in IT have developed the systems they use, we understand their limitations also very well. There was absolutely no connection between their references and the uniqueness of the 3 issues presented in my case. 5. Why the collapse in areas like HR, Finance, Legal & IT across nearly every company and sector compared to the '90s with people unable to do the basic tasks of their own job descriptions, or the job descriptions they create for people reporting to them? Why no investigation into the World Bank Whistle Blower article claiming the existence of a mafia like cartel of central bank leaded headed by certain powerful individuals at the Federal Reserve and the connection to their using the "easy money" they print, to place and promote their own people within these functions in some of the world's most powerful organizations? 6. Why the increasing number of bullying, terrorism, accidents and strange incidents to my wife and others in my family since a similar writ of certeriori was filed in the US Supreme Court back in 2012? Why no action from the lower courts, in spite of the evidence submitted for the back/neck injuries done to my wife during the '08 NJ-VA relocation with the Federal Reserve which led to her disability; and which has continued with incidents like black mold in our home, wife's twin sister and father passing away in USA, my uncle's in India, Middle East and cousin in UK passing away under similar strange circumstances? Isn't it strange that our pet dog suddenly passed away on the same day that the US District Appeals Court passed a verdict against me on May 29, 2018? 7. Why the continued indifference to the accuracy of my '08+ predictions on overprinting of money and increasing weather disasters, as well as the solutions that | have provided and implemented to reverse this per US President mandates, from my now 9/11 patent pending work? Has greed, corruption and debt become so ingrained that people are willing to sacrifice their kids future and not do anything about this case and help increase our planet longevity by another 50-100 years from the current 20-25 years remaining that some NASA scientists are now predicting? ; 8. Why the reluctance to make constitutional amendments and blatant use of the word "sovereign rights" for granting Federal Reserve Banks and Board of Governors immunity from investigation in these areas of imperative importance that require immedia

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent MAXIMUS, Inc. to respond filed.
2018-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2018-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Aslam Handy
Aslam T. Handy — Petitioner
Aslam T. Handy — Petitioner
MAXIMUS, Inc.
Gregory David GrantShulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., Respondent
Gregory David GrantShulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., Respondent
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent