No. 18-5385
Lee Curtis Bell, Jr. v. United States
Tags: commerce-clause congressional-power constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law criminal-law enumerated-powers federalism judicial-review preemption state-responsibility state-rights
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the case should be held in light of any case establishing limitations on Congressional power to criminalize areas of traditional state responsibility under the Commerce Clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the case should be held in light of any case establishing limitations on Congressional power to criminalize areas of traditional state responsibility under the Commerce Clause? il PARTIES Lee Curtis Bell is the petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent; it was the plaintiff-appellee below. iii
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)
Attorneys
Lee Curtis Bell, Jr.
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent