Whether the First Circuit Court of Appeals has abused its discretion by failing to decide petitioner's application for permission to file a second or successive § 2255 motion within the 30-day statutory deadline

QUESTION PRESENTED FoR REVIEW eee lc KEVICW \. Should this Court use its genes Supevisory authority te rectify an ‘abuse, ithen the eaceptional time of over two years has lapseol since. Petitioner has Filed an application for permise ion td proceed OA Q Second , OF successive § BASS, when Congress has specifically Commanded thet the Court of appeals “chell " decide the app lication “no later then 30 days der Filing " @8 USC § 2244 COO), and His Courts precedent interpreting this statute held the court of appeals “must make a cleciston on the appliection within 30 days, “ Tyler v Cain, 533 us O56, b64 (4001), a a PARITES WNaniet Dehn Riley, Retrhoner Fitst Cireuit Couctot Appecls Res pondeatUnite States Rea — Patky tn Taterect: TABLE oF CONTENT-s Questions Presenteol a Parties 2. — Citehons 4 Jurtscioton I Statute Involved 4 Stakement of facts Ss Argument 6 Reliet Sought 5 g Protof Cervice ,