No. 18-5417

David Hardy v. William Adams, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-31
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-vi civil-procedure civil-rights constitution constitutional-duty due-process judicial-bias judicial-conduct legal-precedent rule-10 sixth-circuit sixth-circuit-court-of-appeals standing supreme-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment Punishment Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do federal judges have a constitutional duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, via the mandate language of Article VI of same Constitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Do federal judges have a constitutional duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, via, the mandate language of Article VI of same Constitution? Plaintiff emphatically, states YES. 2. Do federal judges have the authority to change established law due to their unambiguous biasness? Plaintiff emphatically, states NO. 3. Will this Supreme Court uphold its RULE 10, whereas, it states ... A petition for , Writ of certiorari will be granted only for compelling reasons... Plaintiff solemnly request it will. 4. Again, will this Supreme Court uphold its RUL 10, whereas, a panel from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings. Plaintiff solemnly request it will. 5. Again, will this Supreme Court uphold its RULE 10, whereas, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts With rélévarit decisions of this Court. ; : Plaintiff solemnly request it will. ; 6

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-23
Waiver of right of respondents Williams Adams, Linda Adams, Robert Ault, John Russell, Randy Witgen, Robert Riedel, Robert Batho, Levi Bender, Scott Beamish, Todd Tarbell, Michael Olson, and Christopher Darling to respond filed.
2018-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2018)

Attorneys

David Hardy
David Hardy — Petitioner
David Hardy — Petitioner
Williams Adams, Linda Adams, Robert Ault, John Russell, Randy Witgen, Robert Riedel, Robert Batho, Levi Bender, Scott Beamish, Todd Tarbell, Michael Olson, and Christopher Darling
Aaron David LindstromMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Aaron David LindstromMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent