David Hardy v. William Adams, et al.
Do federal judges have a constitutional duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, via, the mandate language of Article VI of same Constitution?
Plaintiff emphatically, states YES.
Do federal judges have the authority to change established law due to their unambiguous biasness?
Plaintiff emphatically, states NO.
Will this Supreme Court uphold its RULE 10, whereas, it states ... A petition for Writ of certiorari will be granted only for compelling reasons...
Plaintiff solemnly request it will.
Again, will this Supreme Court uphold its RUL 10, whereas, a panel from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings.
Plaintiff solemnly request it will.
Again, will this Supreme Court uphold its RULE 10, whereas, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts With rel evant decisions of this Court.
Plaintiff solemnly request it will.
Do federal judges have a constitutional duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, via the mandate language of Article VI of same Constitution?