Whether the New Mexico state bail law as applied ($30.42) to a bill of rights violation, purposely keeping a recluse out of the court process in violation of due process

No question identified. : a ww anes wsneQUESTION(S). PRESENTED. | oernmeass 1s He New Mode State hil Law as appli-d ($30.42) a bi oF LFS Jeryinay erin’) not responding to rtion’, purposely Keeping “rf acluse out oF the Covk oceans in violapiog of edo _ =, Es due peney of Var Still a Aviad by Srey C(Srrith v Plthpr 82) uy. Ts Foccin'y G Wlontal bealth Jaye on 4 Colles icsbeb—aradinbe Who ins Hh ype provrding Propria Peso and deeds saverdl Orders of . : peobecties Pan bard lager A Ut plato ov th Armd ern? Fare} v Col 95) a c. ts m "VS se Jaen that pr ply relay to Vishen ; Com panjeahe With acuse ard Cortiury +o defy vishs of 4 hinhly ebverted inbividuad “inesSective comS-) 7 Sdeicclaal — Note Coundel hay been abril refused b, Ty easing AN individual to q Your without til even Thouth fend as dernbed In wetting 4 violation of Speed Tal’? | Uitk av hishey of viclew, n9 Fight) tickay hile enslaved’? g, Ts enslaviind, innocent individuals Cruel md vnusval penthraHT aa ee m