No. 18-5427
Monclaire Saint Louis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure curative-instruction curative-instructions due-process evidence jury-bias jury-instructions kidnapping prejudice prejudicial-error rape witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether witness testimony about a rape committed by someone other than the defendant during a kidnapping creates prejudice that cannot be overcome by a curative instruction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether witness testimony, on more than one occasion, reveals that a rape was committed during a kidnapping, by someone other than the defendant, create a prejudice that is too significant to overcome with any curative instruction to the jury?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2018)
Attorneys
Monclaire Saint Louis
Nader Hasan — Law Offices of Nader Hasan, P.C., Petitioner
Nader Hasan — Law Offices of Nader Hasan, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent