Whether the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights were violated by an unlawful search and seizure, false arrest, and false imprisonment without consent, and whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by ineffective assistance of counsel at various stages of the criminal proceedings

ESTION(S) PRESENTED IWAs ExcéssivE, FRG FALE ARLES. WLAWF™ ULly seer ind Sélzypb FALSE ARPET Wille” Phopy Ble AIT” TDM NA consénl False APBEs/ Lhip plol CoNSENT UNLAWFUL SEAR AWD sEIBRL Ibib Nol Con sEWT FALSE ApiesT AN FALSE IniPPison meh wilted ANY ChinE CommMTIEh AT TPE Coup] ¥ LWits ACHE, Tbib MoT CoN sENT WhorspullY CoNViien, Ibi We T <onsENT bik Phocess Viekgliohl Lbjb HA const Use conshilajiowAl Plex] \Vielaon_U CoN SIfTUlenAL, Ibip NA Nsen WIALicious Phos culioN ABUSE of PRectss FIER ALRET Tbib Nol CoNséM To Pull oul My lip BANKS Zssué ChEbT Cakes Fhen) may WALLET by swiping. na” LEGIT MATE BIMIS: CARA Wi Hou! THE cout SEAL WAPSANT WHid THERE BRE Wy PhivgE INFRA A) To THE CREDIT CARS MAGNETIC JaiPs oF MY CARBS Witicy Lwas WkoNe fully conVISEL WilHouT ANY ChimE comptes wile my leeiTind& CREDIT CARDS SEE: PEOPLE y. SAN KALA, AND SANKABA \r OHDRAL My ARRAIENMENT couNsEL WAS INEFFETIVE IY Jpeg) counsel AT CRiminal PPocEbuRE Wes INEFFETIVE NV) y¥ PininraL APPEAL Counst WAS INEFFEDVE W)y Pals i in, Twas phecess HAs PRo sé A/ Soulyepy/ I S/Picl Col ef WVEW YR pyy FALSE ARREST LA Mis Pheckss Hibs Pho SEAT Sgepis Gacy wukl OF APPEAL MEU/ YORK, PELE. ou RE AE Be VIEW Ny CRinlial CASE UNconsiTiton a ey ep 7! My Ve CALI PRIVIA, BP3 US — 134 5-7 Zhe 14 ED 2b k30Zoli SEES PEOPLE \/o SAN KARA NYS 3D(2elg) Bis Ny O slip of-0022h3