No. 18-5449
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 appeals civil-procedure confrontation criminal-procedure district-court-review double-jeopardy due-process federal-habeas habeas-corpus indictment motion-to-vacate post-conviction-relief self-incrimination sentencing speedy-trial standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the district court and court of appeals denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and § 2244 motions despite evidence showing no crime was committed, in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : IN THE . SUPREME COURT OF THE Snanda mue PETITION FOR WRIT on ee . Petitioner, Michael D. Smith, respectfully pray that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgement below. OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals of my 28 USC 2255 motion denial, appears at
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent