Can a state deny a criminal defendant the constitutional right to appeal with the effective assistance of counsel?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CAN A STATE, SUCH AS THE STATE OF TEXAS, WHICH HAS AN ESTABLISHED SYSTEM OF APPEAL WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL WITH AN ADEQUATE RECORD FOREGO THIS REQUIREMENT AND FORCE THE PETITIONER TO PROCEED, PRO SE ON HIS ONE AND ONLY DIRECT APPEAL? KEK KKRREEKE GROUND PETITIONER ARGUED TO THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WHICH WAS DENIED WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER APPLICANT IS ILLEGALLY RESTRAINED HAVING BEEN DENIED THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO APPEAL WITH THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. THIS VIOLATED APPLICANT'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL, AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AS GUARANTEED BY AMENDMENTS 6 AND 14 TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. See Douglas v California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963); Evitts v Lucey. 105 S.Ct. 830 (1985).~