No. 18-5470
Jeremy J. Bohlman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compulsory-process compulsory-process-clause confrontation-clause criminal-evidence due-process due-process-clause evidence fed-rule-evidence-412 federal-rules-of-evidence-412 rape-allegations rape-shield-law sexual-assault sexual-behavior subsequent-behavior-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Fed.R.Evid 412 bars a defendant from introducing evidence showing that the alleged victim engaged in subsequent sexual acts inconsistent with her rape allegations even after the government introduced subsequent behavior evidence which was purportedly consistent with her rape allegations
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Fed.R.Evid 412 bars a defendant from introducing evidence showing that | the alleged victim engaged in subsequent sexual acts inconsistent with her rape allegations even after the government introduced subsequent behavior evidence which ' was purportedly consistent with her rape allegations. : : i i i : i i i i i
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2018)
Attorneys
Jeremy J. Bohlman
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent