Whether McQuiggin v. Perkins permits a state court prisoner to rely on 'actual innocence' as a gateway to pursue constitutional claims that were previously raised but dismissed (as time barred) in a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013), permits a state court prisoner to rely on “actual innocence” as a gateway to pursue constitutional claims that were previously raised but dismissed (as time barred) in a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The Petitioner is a state court prisoner currently serving a sentence of life imprisonment. iii