No. 18-5473

Justin Michael Credico v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment free-speech jury-instructions sentencing subjective-intent"
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the jury instructions on subjective intent for 18 USC § 875(c) were proper in light of the Elonis case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Qluestions Cresented _ _ pression Delre his Courts | Was provided to the pertioner, Causing He yovernment Petitioner's (eburtable presumption, ineburtable in tavor Cations a pro secibable +ywve Hhyrear_tnder_ 1¥USC3 es 3) With He Elonis case as guidance ; Were He jon instructions proper with tesacds to subjective wry instruction intent tor Ie USCS IS? Reed Rel | Acero ethenticity nr ee Section ey ae pay a9 — STR SCT Scand Fist Amendment 11 Ants Vand = Thies Lous Endoremene —23-2% TR Counts Dard Y= Tnmediate Family BAD Sub iecti fo is StHuctions 6 “Table of Citations Cases Rone NO, oT Rirandenbun v. Ohio, z= gg 45 395 US 444 ee Carter v. United States, 80 US 085 Chaplinsky ve Dew Hampshire. | 234 3ISUS SES Communist Fatty. Vv. Wwhitc omb, IZ NA US | Elonis_v United States, passim 135 S, Cr 200! : _ Fo oli s 53) F.3d $04 (9th Cir ) SH US SOF HG US JOS” a SE US 5B News York exrel. Spitzer vy. Opertion Rescue, 39 az3 f. 3d ls4 Qad Gc) ; it oo Coses pet 3670S 299 3d 298 Cd Cr A@26 80 F Sum. ad S5d@ (Wd PA 19 : _ United States. Knob], QQ 39 Bd “AF Cd. Ge WEF) SIS Fd HA Bd. Ge. 1975 RUS 6G — Victor v. Nebraska, yp 5B 3843 BUG US FOS a Va Statutes a |e USC$ IIS possi IF USCS 323) | Os USCS 129| | Others pane 00. First Amendment pocsim V — Jurisdictional S+atement bc Violation 0 tour Counts of Violation oF [ UNC . “The District Coure had jurisdiction. pursucund +0 lS USc § 393! This Court therebore has jucisdiction Over ox _ ; _. ce a a a a a a a a a a a a a (9 ce ce a Record Below Petitioner appealed Jom his conviction alte 6a \ury_ tial Sor threatening Sederal nents and thei immediate Family members, in Violation oy 18 USC ENS, : the suNiciency_oF the evidence that he violated 8 \I5, cad the jury instructions on Subjective intent. A I Victions Aster consideration ot all +he ContentionNS (aised, i+ is od judyed and iv at the May aSth, ADIZ wv @ pistriet Court be and hereby is _aticmed. All in ocordance with he opinion of the Court, ” __ 7 _ Csee #iZ-Al4) a A | Srarement of te Case Anna Complains as Bled nearly Febzwn, OOH, ad Mach [xk 20/2 fetitioner_was detained 00 Februx by [Deh 20/4, and has remained in te J has remained in Federal The indictment Charyed Peritioner with uc Counts oF violating 18 USCS. On february loth, O/Z at the conclusion oF a 3-day trial, Pertoner was found guilty on_all + Counts oF +h e indictment: the Petitioner Id Petitio ner Was Sent entenced to 7@O months incarceration to be ran concurrently Fo one another. _ Courts judgment. Retrtione’s En Rane was lenied, and Statement of the Faces _ _ A. Backyound FRE and other Federal agencies vie Phone, email, andalo te He FRE clone. Okten, these Contacts Contained Content ner prosecuted patil WO Despite no action being taken ayainse_petitiones len after yers ard _hundieds_o con tacts, He sovenment decided hae it Tad-all chanyed on Febcvan, Ge, O14. Bod on that ate, A Bs Fire Petal Hearing Chalkeying Becta, and Muilensicty ent cea IER. The spvecomens’s Case cogat, Hubiak, star; ie Fax Special rion Hl ‘a bea) mail box suai ee var frou a FTAG sn FT, Hie leg fhe to a CD iC. tu _—_ the jovernment Ihtended to we at tial __ _— inal banswee_ petitioners technical questions. C.D nd_ Hearing (Stacks) OO chal and _Consisendl, disputed A okemail_messaygs. —Hobiako¢ ab Phila. FO Ollie Hubial detied Ginsbug's te recog ere 00 _Tonner_avwilable ip Fubal . becavy ki ence _¢ Sysee a) ) Ginshun OSked -b see Ae) Aor Ab overnient ied _ at He Starks_heacinys.. Ar_analyss pechemed upoa that Cl) termined A, not &, messayes, And, out of Hn onhy_ ubiat ShoWweo me a Cassette hat was joo Not in an _evick ope, ang : nid me that the_oriyh SSe ‘li Use 2 COO I fo) x voicemails. Bo. cdony #0 a Hobie Mlligag. plays : OK mail iny @Q S| aicerp no om te Voicemal S LA wie (E7 Cocdin 2 OKSCHe ON A CaSsetre (aorocr placed CC eS; aterpho a “This tuas troubling since that nous meant theC) evidence _ the jovernment was vsiny at trial Was pot pho duced tom th Ftac, but by

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2018)

Attorneys

Justin M. Credico
Justin Michael Credico — Petitioner
Justin Michael Credico — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent