Has the U.S. Court of Appeals abused its discretion and committed reversible error in dismissing Ebron's 42 USC § 1983 appeal, finding no reversable error in the decision of the district court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Has the US. Court of Appeals abused 4s discretion Gnd Committed reijecsag/e err in aAisassing LEbron's 72 USC, $1983, Appeal, finding no reversable. erac sn the decision of the district Court? a Have the Courts belowe denied Ebron Due hocess in the proceeding upon his 31983 action, Kihere hes Claims were based upon the quthonty as set forth 19 FRANKLIN V. SHIELDS ef, a1, 399 F Supp, 309 (wd, VA, 1978) 9 3. Did the US. Couct of Appeals ‘Comrmtt revecsa ble. 19 Upholding the District Court SeciSron, ushere. the District Couct Wd not Qe Ebron notice before. ASisrmUSSING AS Comploret ? 2.